UNIFORM BUILDING BY-LAWS, 1984 [UBBL]
IN DESIGN
UBBL : PART IV
The REQUIRED TEMPORARY WORKS during construction [By-Laws Sections 48 - 52],
By Law 48 – PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR BUILDING ERECTION [i.e. the Contractor] to display the project board and the protective hoarding
By Law 52 – BUILDING =>18.3m HIGH to be installed with RISING MAINS to comply with By Law 232 – Wet or Dry Rising System for Buildings Under Construction
STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS and considerations e.g. dead, superimposed and dynamic loads and, structural materials and elements [By-Laws Sections 53 - 80],
Structural Design to be in accordance with MS EN 1991-1-1 and, Wind Loads to MS1553
By Laws 70 – 71 - PARAPETS AND BALUSTRADES,
• VEHICLE BARRIERS for car-parks
1. 8km/hr for access ramp and
2. up to 32km/hr for downward travel for a representative 1.5 metric ton vehicle
[UBBL SELANGOR Rev2012] By Laws 70 – 71 [AMENDED]
Parapets, balustrades and Lower Panel of Cladding/Curtain Walls and, vehicle barriers, shall be designed in accordance with MS EN 1991-1-1 for minimum loads [parapets and balustrades] and impact force of vehicles [vehicle barrier for car parks]
[UBBL SELANGOR Rev2012] By Law 72(3) [AMENDED]
Design of basement to include any artesian pressure
[UBBL SELANGOR Rev2012] By Laws 73(1), (2) and (3) [AMENDED]
The earthworks, the underground building works and the foundations shall be designed based on field and laboratory tests initiated and supervised by a PE with relevant geotechnical experience. Design to be satisfy MS EN 1997.
[UBBL SELANGOR Rev2012] By Law 74 DELETED
[UBBL SELANGOR Rev2012] By Law 75 [AMENDED]
RC Foundations shall be designed to MS EN 1990, MS EN 1991 and MS EN 1992
[UBBL SELANGOR Rev2012] By Laws 76 & 77 DELETED
[UBBL SELANGOR Rev2012] By Law 76A [NEW]
Buildings on Slopes shall comply with any planning requirements determined by Local Authority
[UBBL SELANGOR Rev2012] By Law 78 [AMENDED]
Foundations shall be below invert level of drains
[UBBL SELANGOR Rev2012] By Law 79 [AMENDED]
Foundations under external and party wall shall be within own boundaries
[UBBL SELANGOR Rev2012] By Law 80 [AMENDED]
Structures above foundations shall be designed to comply with MS EN 1990 – 1996, 1998 and 1999
By Law 56 refers to 4TH SCHEDULE – Weight of Materials
[UBBL SELANGOR Rev2012] By Laws 54 – 57, 59 – 65 and, 67 – 69 [AMENDED]Structural Design to be in accordance with MS EN 1991-1-1 and, Wind Loads to MS1553
By Laws 70 – 71 - PARAPETS AND BALUSTRADES,
• VEHICLE BARRIERS for car-parks
1. 8km/hr for access ramp and
2. up to 32km/hr for downward travel for a representative 1.5 metric ton vehicle
[UBBL SELANGOR Rev2012] By Laws 70 – 71 [AMENDED]
Parapets, balustrades and Lower Panel of Cladding/Curtain Walls and, vehicle barriers, shall be designed in accordance with MS EN 1991-1-1 for minimum loads [parapets and balustrades] and impact force of vehicles [vehicle barrier for car parks]
[UBBL SELANGOR Rev2012] By Law 72(3) [AMENDED]
Design of basement to include any artesian pressure
[UBBL SELANGOR Rev2012] By Laws 73(1), (2) and (3) [AMENDED]
The earthworks, the underground building works and the foundations shall be designed based on field and laboratory tests initiated and supervised by a PE with relevant geotechnical experience. Design to be satisfy MS EN 1997.
[UBBL SELANGOR Rev2012] By Law 74 DELETED
[UBBL SELANGOR Rev2012] By Law 75 [AMENDED]
RC Foundations shall be designed to MS EN 1990, MS EN 1991 and MS EN 1992
[UBBL SELANGOR Rev2012] By Laws 76 & 77 DELETED
[UBBL SELANGOR Rev2012] By Law 76A [NEW]
Buildings on Slopes shall comply with any planning requirements determined by Local Authority
[UBBL SELANGOR Rev2012] By Law 78 [AMENDED]
Foundations shall be below invert level of drains
[UBBL SELANGOR Rev2012] By Law 79 [AMENDED]
Foundations under external and party wall shall be within own boundaries
[UBBL SELANGOR Rev2012] By Law 80 [AMENDED]
Structures above foundations shall be designed to comply with MS EN 1990 – 1996, 1998 and 1999
Hi Sir,
ReplyDeleteSo far only Selangor published UBBL 2012? Can we use UBBL 2012 at other states?
I believe many states are following suit to use this 2012 version. It is a higher specs version and I would recommend the adoption of this version especially for its amendments on safety matters.
ReplyDeleteBTW, I think about 4 states are already adopting this version.